[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DF4469.7090603@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:30:17 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: exynos: List vtmu-supply as optional
property in DT binding
Hello Eduardo,
On 03/08/2016 06:07 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:19:09PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The Exynos Thermal Management Unit binding says that the vtmu-supply
>> is optional but is listed in the required properties section. Add an
>> optional properties section and move the regulator property there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 9 ++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> index faa62059b5c5..70b4c16c7ed8 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
>> @@ -41,9 +41,6 @@
>> for current TMU channel
>> -- "tmu_sclk" clock for functional operation of the current TMU
>> channel
>> -- vtmu-supply: This entry is optional and provides the regulator node supplying
>> - voltage to TMU. If needed this entry can be placed inside
>> - board/platform specific dts file.
>>
>> The Exynos TMU supports generating interrupts when reaching given
>> temperature thresholds. Number of supported thermal trip points depends
>
> Where is this patch based on? I checked it on my fixes and linus
> branches, also on linux-next 0308 branch, and none of those apply clean.
>
I mentioned in the cover letter [0] that this series were based on top
of in-flight patches from Krzysztof Kozlowski to avoid merge conflicts.
Those have not landed yet either so maybe you could look at those first?
> Can you please send this based on upstream kernel?
>
Ok, my intention was to make picking both patch series easier but if
this is inconvenient to you, I can base on top of current mainline
and let you handle the merge conflicts (or ask Krzysztof to resend
on top of my patches).
[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/18/591
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists