[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160308220539.GB4404@linux-uzut.site>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 14:05:39 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
dave@...olabs.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/3] rtmutex: Avoid barrier in rt_mutex_handle_deadlock
The very nature of rt_mutex_handle_deadlock() implies that this
patch is merely a formality, as in practice the saved barrier
is of little use. That said, we can relax setting the task state
and be done with it; blocking unconditionally... this is a deadlock!
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 8eb99b7f1ac8..c3d3c8e8ea5c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static void rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock,
*/
rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w);
while (1) {
- set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule();
}
}
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists