[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VhMY=YO7zVYeP-+LY0gPvQ8yjaAUEGVJrMGLwbGjqVmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:34:44 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com>,
Xu Jianqun <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
elaine.zhang@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
Xing Zheng,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Xing Zheng <zhengxing@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_DRV, "emmc_drv", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON0, 1),
> + MMC(SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE, "emmc_sample", "clk_sdmmc", RK3399_SDMMC_CON1, 1),
Can you and Jianqun Xu please coordinate? Though I don't have a TRM
for rk3399 and I haven't looked through this whole patch, I know for
sure there's a problem when I pick the latest patch series from both
of you it doesn't compile.
I believe this is the latest from each of you in patchwork:
8462411 [v3,1/3] dt-bindings: add bindings for rk3399 clock controller
8462431 [v3,2/3] clk: rockchip: add dt-binding header for rk3399
8462441 [v3,3/3] ARM64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for rk3399
8463741 [RESEND,v2,1/5] clk: rockchip: add more mux parameters for
new pll sources
8463801 [RESEND,v2,2/5] clk: rockchip: Add support for multiple
clock providers
8463771 [RESEND,v2,3/5] clk: rockchip: add new pll-type for rk3399
and similar socs
8463781 [RESEND,v2,4/5] clk: rockchip: add a COMPOSITE_FRACMUX_NOGATE type
8463831 [RESEND,v2,5/5] clk: rockchip: add clock controller for the RK3399
Specifically your patch from March 1st refers to SCLK_SDMMC_DRV and
SCLK_SDMMC_SAMPLE. Those defines existed in Jianqun Xu's patch back
on Feb 19th <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8355411/>, but his
latest patch series from March 1st
<https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8462431/> no longer has those
#defines.
Can you two resolve this so I can pick both patch series and see that
they compile? ...or let me know where I messed up, of course.
Thanks!
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists