[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLzEku0bWrBf13a7TshQ429YF94f7kdSuooLLPnCyMKO0jftA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 15:54:16 -0800
From: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Enric Balletbò <enric.balletbo@...labora.co.uk>,
Vic Yang <victoryang@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
Randall Spangler <rspangler@...omium.org>,
Todd Broch <tbroch@...omium.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] mfd: cros_ec: Add cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status helper
Thanks Tomeu! Small nit below, other wise looks good to me.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com> wrote:
> So that callers of cros_ec_cmd_xfer don't have to repeat boilerplate
> code when checking for errors from the EC side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v4: None
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
>
> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> index c792e116e621..e45d6750bbdf 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> @@ -472,3 +472,17 @@ int cros_ec_get_next_event(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev)
> return get_keyboard_state_event(ec_dev);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(cros_ec_get_next_event);
> +
> +int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> + struct cros_ec_command *msg)
> +{
> + int ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer(ec_dev, msg);
> +
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(ec_dev->dev, "Command xfer error (err:%d)\n", ret);
> + else if (msg->result)
Could you check for if (msg->result != EC_RES_SUCCESS) explicitly?
> + return -EECRESULT - msg->result;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> index 1f88418a36cf..b6961c717209 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
> #define EC_MAX_REQUEST_OVERHEAD 1
> #define EC_MAX_RESPONSE_OVERHEAD 2
>
> +/* ec_command return value for non-success result from EC */
> +#define EECRESULT 1000
> +
> /*
> * Command interface between EC and AP, for LPC, I2C and SPI interfaces.
> */
> @@ -250,6 +253,21 @@ int cros_ec_cmd_xfer(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> struct cros_ec_command *msg);
>
> /**
> + * cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status - Send a command to the ChromeOS EC
> + *
> + * This function is identical to cros_ec_cmd_xfer, except it returns succes
> + * status only if both the command was transmitted successfully and the EC
> + * replied with success status. It's not necessary to check msg->result when
> + * using this function.
> + *
> + * @ec_dev: EC device
> + * @msg: Message to write
> + * @return: Num. of bytes transferred on success, <0 on failure
> + */
> +int cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> + struct cros_ec_command *msg);
> +
> +/**
> * cros_ec_remove - Remove a ChromeOS EC
> *
> * Call this to deregister a ChromeOS EC, then clean up any private data.
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
Benson Leung
Senior Software Engineer, Chrom* OS
bleung@...omium.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists