linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bus: simple-pm-bus: Use ARCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160308002953.GF5024@verge.net.au>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:29:53 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: simple-pm-bus: Use ARCH_RENESAS

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 02:22:57PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:31:49AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> >> > Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
> >> >
> >> > This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
> >> > ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more
> >> > appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> >
> > I'm a little unsure of who should take this but for now I will
> > queue it up in next with a view to sending a pull request to Linus
> > for v4.6. I'm open to other ideas.
> 
> All but two entries in drivers/bus/Kconfig are for ARM platforms (the
> other two are for MIPS platforms), so I think arm-soc is appropriate.
> 
> Alternatively, GregKH?

Point taken. I'll queue it up for v4.7 for arm-soc.