lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160308003904.GA3769@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:39:04 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc:	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Timo Kokkonen <timo.kokkonen@...code.fi>,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/10] watchdog: Add support for keepalives triggered
 by infrastructure

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:50:23PM +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> > Hi Wim,
> > 
> > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 11:49:56AM +0100, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> > > Hi Guenter,
> > > 
> > > > The watchdog infrastructure is currently purely passive, meaning
> > > > it only passes information from user space to drivers and vice versa.
> > > > 
> > [ ... ]
> > > 
> > > Patches 1 till 7 of this series has been added to linux-watchdog-next.
> > > 
> > Thanks a lot!
> 
> Did you receive any feedback/test-results on patches 8 till 10 ?
> 
No, unfortunately not. I think I'll ping some of those involved in the driver
development, but I'll do it after the -rc is out. No need to rush with those
now.

Thanks,
Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ