[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160308075131.GE8418@lukather>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 08:51:31 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma: sun4i: expose block size and wait cycle
configuration to DMA users
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:25:47AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:30:24PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:08:57PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > Hi Vinod,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 20:24:29 +0530
> > > Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:59:31AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > > > +/* Dedicated DMA parameter register layout */
> > > > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_DST_DATA_BLK_SIZE(n) (((n) - 1) << 24)
> > > > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_DST_WAIT_CYCLES(n) (((n) - 1) << 16)
> > > > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_SRC_DATA_BLK_SIZE(n) (((n) - 1) << 8)
> > > > > +#define SUN4I_DDMA_PARA_SRC_WAIT_CYCLES(n) (((n) - 1) << 0)
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/**
> > > > > + * struct sun4i_dma_chan_config - DMA channel config
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * @para: contains information about block size and time before checking
> > > > > + * DRQ line. This is device specific and only applicable to dedicated
> > > > > + * DMA channels
> > > >
> > > > What information, can you elobrate.. And why can't you use existing
> > > > dma_slave_config for this?
> > >
> > > Block size is related to the device FIFO size. I guess it allows the
> > > DMA channel to launch a transfer of X bytes without having to check the
> > > DRQ line (the line telling the DMA engine it can transfer more data
> > > to/from the device). The wait cycles information is apparently related
> > > to the number of clks the engine should wait before polling/checking
> > > the DRQ line status between each block transfer. I'm not sure what it
> > > saves to put WAIT_CYCLES() to something != 1, but in their BSP,
> > > Allwinner tweak that depending on the device.
>
> we already have block size aka src/dst_maxburst, why not use that one.
I'm not sure it's really the same thing. The DMA controller also has a
burst parameter, that is either 1 byte or 8 bytes, and ends up being
different from this one.
> Why does dmaengine need to wait? Can you explain that
We have no idea, we thought you might have one :)
It doesn't really makes sense to us, but it does have a significant
impact on the throughput.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists