linux-kernel - [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Change checksum variables to u32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-bc864af13f34d19c911f5691d87bdacc9ce109f5@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 00:12:37 -0800
From:	tip-bot for Chris Bainbridge <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, bp@...e.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chris.bainbridge@...il.com,
	hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Change checksum variables
 to u32

Commit-ID:  bc864af13f34d19c911f5691d87bdacc9ce109f5
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/bc864af13f34d19c911f5691d87bdacc9ce109f5
Author:     Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 11:10:00 +0100
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:08:44 +0100

x86/microcode/intel: Change checksum variables to u32

Microcode checksum verification should be done using unsigned 32-bit
values otherwise the calculation overflow results in undefined
behaviour.

This is also nicely documented in the SDM, section "Microcode Update
Checksum":

  "To check for a corrupt microcode update, software must perform a
  unsigned DWORD (32-bit) checksum of the microcode update. Even though
  some fields are signed, the checksum procedure treats all DWORDs as
  unsigned. Microcode updates with a header version equal to 00000001H
  must sum all DWORDs that comprise the microcode update. A valid
  checksum check will yield a value of 00000000H."

but for some reason the code has been using ints from the very
beginning.

In practice, this bug possibly manifested itself only when doing the
microcode data checksum - apparently, currently shipped Intel microcode
doesn't have an extended signature table for which we do checksum
verification too.

  UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c:105:12
  signed integer overflow:
  -1500151068 + -2125470173 cannot be represented in type 'int'
  CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.5.0-rc5+ #495
  ...
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack
   ? inotify_ioctl
   ubsan_epilogue
   handle_overflow
   __ubsan_handle_add_overflow
   microcode_sanity_check
   get_matching_model_microcode.isra.2.constprop.8
   ? early_idt_handler_common
   ? strlcpy
   ? find_cpio_data
   load_ucode_intel_bsp
   load_ucode_bsp
   ? load_ucode_bsp
   x86_64_start_kernel

[ Expand and massage commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: hmh@....eng.br
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456834359-5132-1-git-send-email-chris.bainbridge@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c
index b96896b..99ca2c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel_lib.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
 	unsigned long total_size, data_size, ext_table_size;
 	struct microcode_header_intel *mc_header = mc;
 	struct extended_sigtable *ext_header = NULL;
-	int sum, orig_sum, ext_sigcount = 0, i;
+	u32 sum, orig_sum, ext_sigcount = 0, i;
 	struct extended_signature *ext_sig;
 
 	total_size = get_totalsize(mc_header);
@@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
 
 	/* check extended table checksum */
 	if (ext_table_size) {
-		int ext_table_sum = 0;
-		int *ext_tablep = (int *)ext_header;
+		u32 ext_table_sum = 0;
+		u32 *ext_tablep = (u32 *)ext_header;
 
 		i = ext_table_size / DWSIZE;
 		while (i--)
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
 	orig_sum = 0;
 	i = (MC_HEADER_SIZE + data_size) / DWSIZE;
 	while (i--)
-		orig_sum += ((int *)mc)[i];
+		orig_sum += ((u32 *)mc)[i];
 	if (orig_sum) {
 		if (print_err)
 			pr_err("aborting, bad checksum\n");