linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Remove non existing irq's

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYBSdriGZgJT9S1Dhmw-wpDOycEtRM-wWby2HmGekUj1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:01:45 +0700
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Henry Paulissen <henry@...ronetworks.nl>
Cc:	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
	Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@...iatek.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
	Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...com>,
	"open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Allwinner sunXi SoC support" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: Remove non existing irq's

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Henry Paulissen <henry@...ronetworks.nl> wrote:

> While I was testing irq's on the cubietruck I found a couple of
> not working irq pins. Further diving into the problem it opened
> up a mess called "manual".
>
> This so called manual (A20 user manual v1.3 dated 2014-10-10) says:
>
> Pin overview:
>     Page 233:       EINT12 is on pin PC19 mux6.
>     Page 236:       EINT12 is on pin PH12 mux6.
>
> Now, it is a bit strange to have the same IRQ on 2 different pins,
> but I guess this could still be possible hardware wise. But then:
>
> Pin registers:
>     Page 253:       EINT12 is *not* on pin PC19.
>     Page 281:       EINT12 is on pin PH12.
>
> The manual is so contradicting that further tests had to be made
> to see which of the 2 statements where correct.
>
> This patch is based on actual outcome of these tests and not what
> the manual says.
>
> Test procedure used:
>
> Connect a 1 pulse per second (GPS) line to the pin.
>
> echo pin### > /sys/class/gpio/export
> echo in > /sys/class/gpio/gpio###/direction
> echo rising > /sys/class/gpio/gpio###/edge
>
> Check /proc/interrupts if a irq was attached and if irq's where
> received.
>
> Signed-off-by: Henry Paulissen <henry@...ronetworks.nl>

Patch applied with Maxime's ACK.

Yours,
Linus Walleij