linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] request_firmware() on memory constrained devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5879185.BRRaoAY1zb@ws-stein>
Date:	Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:32:21 +0100
From:	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm@...ts.infradead.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] request_firmware() on memory constrained devices

On Tuesday 08 March 2016 16:22:15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Some systems are memory constrained but they need to load very
> large firmwares. 

Out of curiousity, about which sizes of memory and firmware are you talking about?

Regards,
Alexander