[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <525564DD-D0D3-4DEB-9306-3A23288FD83F@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:41:37 +0100
From: Julien Chauveau <chauveau.julien@...il.com>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Documentation: devicetree: Clean up gpio-keys example
> Le 8 mars 2016 à 09:54, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
>> Drop #address-cells and #size-cells, which are not required by the
>> gpio-keys binding documentation, as button sub-nodes are not devices.
>>
>> Reported-by: Julien Chauveau <chauveau.julien@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
>> index 21641236c095..1552a11f6786 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-keys.txt
>> @@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ Example nodes:
>>
>> gpio_keys {
>> compatible = "gpio-keys";
>> - #address-cells = <1>;
>> - #size-cells = <0>;
>> autorepeat;
>> button@21 {
>
> FYI, with "[PATCH] scripts/dtc: Update to upstream version 53bf130b1cdd":
> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg117206.html) applied:
>
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /keyboard/button@21 has a unit
> name, but no reg property
>
Hi Andreas,
This means you can also drop the unit-address (the @21 part) for the button.
What about using a more relevant name like "key_up" instead of "button"?
Julien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists