linux-kernel - Re: user namespace and fully visible proc and sys mounts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lh5t7ryo.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date:	Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:07:11 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: user namespace and fully visible proc and sys mounts

Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> writes:

> On a related note, can we *please* find a way to constrain namespace
> creation in a way that might satisfy the RHEL crowd?

I am not certain to what you are referrring.

As long as folks are willing to work with me I am happy to help design
and design something that makes things better for everyone.  If someone
pushes hard, suggestes crappy patches, and does not listen to
constructive feedback I will shoot their patches down (especially when I
am sick and tired as I have been more than I would like this development
cycle).

Eric