[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DED3F9.8050505@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:30:33 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] thermal: exynos: Fixes for vtmu-supply regulator
handling
Hello Lukasz, Eduardo,
On 02/18/2016 03:19 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On a recent patch series to build a PMIC chip as a module [0], Krzysztof
> asked me to check if all the consumer drivers, using the resources that
> this PMIC provides, already support probe deferral.
>
> While investigating that, I noticed that the Exynos TMU didn't do it so
> this series fix that bug and other two minor issues that I noticed while
> reviewing the driver and its DT binding.
>
> The series are on top of Krzysztof's patches [1,2,3] not because there's
> a dependency but to avoid merge conflicts with in-flight patches. Please
> let me know if you prefer to use a different base instead.
>
> [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/11/857
> [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345791/
> [2]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345741/
> [3]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8345701/
>
> Best regards,
> Javier
>
Any comments about this series?
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists