[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160308000315.465813803@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:02:30 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@...fujitsu.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 05/74] btrfs: async-thread: Fix a use-after-free error for trace
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@...fujitsu.com>
commit 0a95b851370b84a4b9d92ee6d1fa0926901d0454 upstream.
Parameter of trace_btrfs_work_queued() can be freed in its workqueue.
So no one use use that pointer after queue_work().
Fix the user-after-free bug by move the trace line before queue_work().
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/async-thread.c
@@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ static inline void __btrfs_queue_work(st
list_add_tail(&work->ordered_list, &wq->ordered_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wq->list_lock, flags);
}
- queue_work(wq->normal_wq, &work->normal_work);
trace_btrfs_work_queued(work);
+ queue_work(wq->normal_wq, &work->normal_work);
}
void btrfs_queue_work(struct btrfs_workqueue *wq,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists