[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DE1AE2.5070908@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 18:20:50 -0600
From: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
CC: <vigneshr@...com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<bcousson@...libre.com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 6/6] ARM: dts: DRA7: Add dt nodes for PWMSS
On 03/07/2016 05:53 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>
>> From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
>>
>> Add PWMSS device tree nodes for DRA7 SoC family and add documentation
>> for dt bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
>> [fcooper@...com: Use updated bindings for PWMSS and ePWM]
>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
>> ---
>> Version 4 changes:
>> Remove hwmod entries.
>> Add clocks/clock-names to pwm nodes.
> Hmm, what about moving the eqep, ecap DT nodes under the epwmss nodes?
>
>
> - Paul
We don't have a driver for eQEP which is why there is no DT
entry for it. For eCAP, the original patch series didn't
include the eCAP DT nodes and I never verified why this is
the case. In our TI tree we have eCAP0 only in the DT. The
TRM doesn't state that eCAP0-2 are unsupported so there
should be entries for all 3 eCAPs.
For AM335x and AM437x, eCAP nodes are already under the
ePWMSS nodes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists