linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56DEF546.9090900@arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 22:52:38 +0700
From:	André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the arm-soc
 tree

On 07/03/16 11:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Wim,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the watchdog tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/arm/foundation-v8.dts
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   d11a89796678 ("arm64: dts: split Foundation model dts to put the GIC separately")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> 
>   fe3a97e8ed02 ("ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in foundation-v8.dts")
> 
> from the watchdog tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

But unfortunately this is the wrong solution. The watchdog DT node
belongs into the (newly created) common foundation-v8.dtsi, not into the
GICv2-only .dts.
So whoever now provides the watchdog patch, can it be rebased on top of
the foundation model .dts rework, so that the new node ends up in the
.dtsi file?
If this is too much hassle I could also send a fix after -rc1 (as the
breakage is not really critical).

Cheers,
Andre.