linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 8 (nfsd)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:02:42 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 8 (nfsd)

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 08:55:29AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/07/16 21:51, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20160307:
> > 
> 
> on x86_64:
> when CONFIG_BLOCK is not enabled:
> 
> ../fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c: In function 'nfsd4_setup_layout_type':
> ../fs/nfsd/nfs4layouts.c:145:39: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
>       sb->s_bdev && sb->s_bdev->bd_disk->fops->pr_ops)
>                                        ^

My fault, this will need a CONFIG_BLOCK ifdef.  I'll send a fix.