linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/5] perf core: Support overwrite ring buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160308173709.GC3017@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:37:09 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, pi3orama@....com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/5] perf core: Support overwrite ring buffer


* Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:

> > fomalhaut:~/go/src/github.com/google/syzkaller> ps aux | grep -i syz
> > mingo      1374  0.0  0.0 118476  2376 pts/2    S+   18:23   0:00 grep --color=auto -i syz
> >
> > and with no kernel messages in dmesg - and with a fully functional system.
> >
> > I'm running the 16-task load on a 120 CPU system - should I increase it to 120?
> > Does the code expect to saturate the system?
> 
> No, it does not expect to saturate the system. Set "procs" to 480, or
> something like that.

Does not seem to help much:

fomalhaut:~> vmstat 10
procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ------cpu-----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy id wa st

 1  0      0 257465904 219940 4736092    0    0     0   102 16022 4396  0  1 99  0  0
 2  0      0 257452144 220496 4755052    0    0     2  3649 14286 4627  0  1 99  0  0
 2  0      0 257473408 221188 4770824    0    0    15  1898 17175 4474  0  1 99  0  0

Only around 1% system utilization. Should I go for 1,000 or more? :)

Peter, do you experience with running syz-kaller on larger CPU count Intel 
systems?

Thanks,

	Ingo