[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1457461223-4301-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:20:20 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
dave@...olabs.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip 0/3] locking/rtmutex: Another crack at spin on owner
Hi,
This is a (painfully late) followup to proposal sometime ago to add
spin on owner to rtmutexes. My first attempt was rather liberal in that
I tried avoiding the pi-dance and let the lock be stolen. However, due to
-rt constraints this series only deals with top-waiter, based on what we
do in the preempt rt patchset.
First two patches are trivial and the whole patchset as survived a week
of locktorture+pi_stress pounding at the same time without anything
breaking. That said, I'm sure it needs more testing and eyeballs, these
paths make my head hurt.
Thanks!
Davidlohr Bueso (3):
rtmutex: Delete save_state member of struct rt_mutex
rtmutex: Add rt_mutex_init_waiter helper
rtmutex: Reduce top-waiter blocking on a lock
include/linux/rtmutex.h | 1 -
kernel/Kconfig.locks | 4 ++
kernel/futex.c | 5 +--
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 17 ++++++++-
5 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists