linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 136/138] net/mlx4_en: Choose time-stamping shift value according to HW frequency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1457565265-15195-137-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed,  9 Mar 2016 15:14:23 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 136/138] net/mlx4_en: Choose time-stamping shift value according to HW frequency

3.13.11-ckt36 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>

commit 31c128b66e5b28f468076e4f3ca3025c35342041 upstream.

Previously, the shift value used for time-stamping was constant and didn't
depend on the HW chip frequency. Change that to take the frequency into account
and calculate the maximal value in cycles per wraparound of ten seconds. This
time slot was chosen since it gives a good accuracy in time synchronization.

Algorithm for shift value calculation:
 * Round up the maximal value in cycles to nearest power of two

 * Calculate maximal multiplier by division of all 64 bits set
   to above result

 * Then, invert the function clocksource_khz2mult() to get the shift from
   maximal mult value

Fixes: ec693d47010e ('net/mlx4_en: Add HW timestamping (TS) support')
Signed-off-by: Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_clock.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_clock.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_clock.c
index fd64410..9180c7e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_clock.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_clock.c
@@ -111,6 +111,24 @@ void mlx4_en_fill_hwtstamps(struct mlx4_en_dev *mdev,
 	hwts->hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(nsec);
 }
 
+#define MLX4_EN_WRAP_AROUND_SEC	10ULL
+
+/* This function calculates the max shift that enables the user range
+ * of MLX4_EN_WRAP_AROUND_SEC values in the cycles register.
+ */
+static u32 freq_to_shift(u16 freq)
+{
+	u32 freq_khz = freq * 1000;
+	u64 max_val_cycles = freq_khz * 1000 * MLX4_EN_WRAP_AROUND_SEC;
+	u64 max_val_cycles_rounded = is_power_of_2(max_val_cycles + 1) ?
+		max_val_cycles : roundup_pow_of_two(max_val_cycles) - 1;
+	/* calculate max possible multiplier in order to fit in 64bit */
+	u64 max_mul = div_u64(0xffffffffffffffffULL, max_val_cycles_rounded);
+
+	/* This comes from the reverse of clocksource_khz2mult */
+	return ilog2(div_u64(max_mul * freq_khz, 1000000));
+}
+
 void mlx4_en_init_timestamp(struct mlx4_en_dev *mdev)
 {
 	struct mlx4_dev *dev = mdev->dev;
@@ -119,12 +137,7 @@ void mlx4_en_init_timestamp(struct mlx4_en_dev *mdev)
 	memset(&mdev->cycles, 0, sizeof(mdev->cycles));
 	mdev->cycles.read = mlx4_en_read_clock;
 	mdev->cycles.mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(48);
-	/* Using shift to make calculation more accurate. Since current HW
-	 * clock frequency is 427 MHz, and cycles are given using a 48 bits
-	 * register, the biggest shift when calculating using u64, is 14
-	 * (max_cycles * multiplier < 2^64)
-	 */
-	mdev->cycles.shift = 14;
+	mdev->cycles.shift = freq_to_shift(dev->caps.hca_core_clock);
 	mdev->cycles.mult =
 		clocksource_khz2mult(1000 * dev->caps.hca_core_clock, mdev->cycles.shift);
 
-- 
2.7.0