[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160310104100.6f906679@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:41:00 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, xfs@....sgi.com
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
fs/ext4/ext4.h
between commit:
109811c20fb8 ("ext4: simplify io_end handling for AIO DIO")
from the ext4 tree and commit:
74c66bcb7eda ("ext4: Fix data exposure after failed AIO DIO")
from the xfs tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 70b8e0409566,56c12df107ab..000000000000
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@@ -1499,15 -1504,16 +1499,6 @@@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struc
ino <= le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count));
}
- static inline void ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(struct inode *inode,
- struct ext4_io_end *io_end)
-static inline ext4_io_end_t *ext4_inode_aio(struct inode *inode)
--{
- if (!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
- io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
- atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_unwritten);
- }
- return inode->i_private;
-}
-
-static inline void ext4_inode_aio_set(struct inode *inode, ext4_io_end_t *io)
-{
- inode->i_private = io;
--}
--
/*
* Inode dynamic state flags
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists