linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:41:00 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, xfs@....sgi.com
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/ext4/ext4.h

between commit:

  109811c20fb8 ("ext4: simplify io_end handling for AIO DIO")

from the ext4 tree and commit:

  74c66bcb7eda ("ext4: Fix data exposure after failed AIO DIO")

from the xfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 70b8e0409566,56c12df107ab..000000000000
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@@ -1499,15 -1504,16 +1499,6 @@@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struc
  		 ino <= le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count));
  }
  
- static inline void ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(struct inode *inode,
- 					      struct ext4_io_end *io_end)
 -static inline ext4_io_end_t *ext4_inode_aio(struct inode *inode)
--{
- 	if (!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
- 		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
- 		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_unwritten);
- 	}
 -	return inode->i_private;
 -}
 -
 -static inline void ext4_inode_aio_set(struct inode *inode, ext4_io_end_t *io)
 -{
 -	inode->i_private = io;
--}
--
  /*
   * Inode dynamic state flags
   */