[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160309234817.GB5220@X58A-UD3R>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 08:48:17 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
To: Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>
Cc: pavankumar kondeti <pavankumar.kondeti@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Subject: Re: Migrated CFS task getting an unfair advantage
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:00:42AM -0800, Andrew Hunter wrote:
> At Google, we essentially reverted 88ec22d and the subsequent tweaks
> to it, keeping vruntime absolute always , instead using
> task_move_group_fair to change the basis of relative min_vruntime
Hello, Andrew
I am curious about how it can be done with absolute value. :-)
> between cpus. We found this made it a lot easier to reason about and
> work with corss-cpu computations. I could post the patch if it would
> be of interest...
I am interested in it.
Thanks,
Byungchul
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists