[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7h7fhcusfv.fsf@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 21:32:52 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/74] 4.4.5-stable review
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 02:11:08AM -0800, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-queue boot: 205 boots: 14 failed, 190 passed with 1 offline (v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31)
>>
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31/
>>
>> Tree: stable-queue
>> Branch: local/linux-4.4.y.queue
>> Git Describe: v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31
>> Git Commit: cc3ba9c14b31161587ce85e9b5d642e730a2d0e8
>> Git URL: git://server.roeck-us.net/git/linux-stable.git
>> Tested: 47 unique boards, 13 SoC families, 18 builds out of 132
>>
>> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.4.4-74-gcc3ba9c14b31&fail
>>
>> arm:
>>
>> mxs_defconfig:
>> imx23-olinuxino: 1 failed lab
>>
>> omap2plus_defconfig:
>> omap4-panda: 1 failed lab
>>
>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y:
>> imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>> imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>> socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>>
>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
>> imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>> imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>> socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>>
>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y:
>> socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>>
>> imx_v6_v7_defconfig:
>> imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>> imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>>
>> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y:
>> imx53-qsrb: 1 failed lab
>> imx6dl-riotboard: 1 failed lab
>> socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
>>
>> Offline Platforms:
>>
>> arm:
>>
>> mxs_defconfig:
>> imx28-duckbill: 1 offline lab
>
> I really don't know what these mean, any chance you can distill these
> down to "all is fine", or "there is a problem with this arch" type
> emails?
All is fine.
These failures are are on newly added boards coming from a new lab and
they're failing in other trees also, so we'll ignore them for now and
check with the specific lab owner.
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists