linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] irqchip/gic-v2: Gather ACPI specific data in a single structure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160309054710.GI26583@lvm>
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:47:10 -0800
From:	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
To:	Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
Cc:	kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@....com,
	fu.wei@...aro.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	wei@...hat.com, al.stone@...aro.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] irqchip/gic-v2: Gather ACPI specific data in a
 single structure

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:29:27AM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> For now, there is only one member. More member will be added later.

questionable commit message

> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
> 
> ---
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> 
>     Changes in v2:
>         - Patch added
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 8f9ebf7..fbde202 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -1245,7 +1245,10 @@ IRQCHIP_DECLARE(pl390, "arm,pl390", gic_of_init);
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -static phys_addr_t cpu_phy_base __initdata;
> +static struct
> +{
> +	phys_addr_t cpu_phy_base;
> +} acpi_data __initdata;
>  
>  static int __init
>  gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
> @@ -1265,10 +1268,10 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>  	 * All CPU interface addresses have to be the same.
>  	 */
>  	gic_cpu_base = processor->base_address;
> -	if (cpu_base_assigned && gic_cpu_base != cpu_phy_base)
> +	if (cpu_base_assigned && gic_cpu_base != acpi_data.cpu_phy_base)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	cpu_phy_base = gic_cpu_base;
> +	acpi_data.cpu_phy_base = gic_cpu_base;
>  	cpu_base_assigned = 1;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1316,7 +1319,7 @@ static int __init gic_v2_acpi_init(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	cpu_base = ioremap(cpu_phy_base, ACPI_GIC_CPU_IF_MEM_SIZE);
> +	cpu_base = ioremap(acpi_data.cpu_phy_base, ACPI_GIC_CPU_IF_MEM_SIZE);
>  	if (!cpu_base) {
>  		pr_err("Unable to map GICC registers\n");
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
super nit: I would use cpu_phys_base instead of cpu_phy_base, but I'll
leave it up to you.

Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>