[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <16afb602640ef43b7782087d6cca17bf6fc13603.1457502970.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:06:51 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] objtool: Prevent infinite recursion in noreturn detection
Ingo reported an infinite loop in objtool with a certain randconfig [1].
With the given config, two functions in crypto/ablkcipher.o contained
sibling calls to each other, which threw the recursive call in
dead_end_function() for a loop (literally!).
Split the noreturn detection into two passes. In the first pass, check
for return instructions. In the second pass, do the potentially
recursive sibling call check. In most cases, the first pass will be
good enough. In the rare case where a second pass is needed, recursion
should hopefully no longer be possible.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160308154909.GA20956@gmail.com
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
---
tools/objtool/builtin-check.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c b/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c
index f7e0eba..80d9ed9 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static bool ignore_func(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
static bool dead_end_function(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
{
int i;
- struct instruction *insn;
+ struct instruction *insn, *func_insn;
bool empty = true;
/*
@@ -154,10 +154,11 @@ static bool dead_end_function(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
if (!func->sec)
return false;
- insn = find_instruction(file, func->sec, func->offset);
- if (!insn)
+ func_insn = find_instruction(file, func->sec, func->offset);
+ if (!func_insn)
return false;
+ insn = func_insn;
list_for_each_entry_from(insn, &file->insns, list) {
if (insn->sec != func->sec ||
insn->offset >= func->offset + func->len)
@@ -167,6 +168,21 @@ static bool dead_end_function(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
if (insn->type == INSN_RETURN)
return false;
+ }
+
+ if (empty)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * A function can have a sibling call instead of a return. In that
+ * case, the function's dead-end status depends on whether the target
+ * of the sibling call returns.
+ */
+ insn = func_insn;
+ list_for_each_entry_from(insn, &file->insns, list) {
+ if (insn->sec != func->sec ||
+ insn->offset >= func->offset + func->len)
+ break;
if (insn->type == INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL) {
struct instruction *dest = insn->jump_dest;
@@ -194,7 +210,7 @@ static bool dead_end_function(struct objtool_file *file, struct symbol *func)
return false;
}
- return !empty;
+ return true;
}
/*
--
2.4.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists