[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DFC026.5020909@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:18:14 +0700
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@....com,
fu.wei@...aro.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
wei@...hat.com, al.stone@...aro.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] irqchip/gic-v2: Gather ACPI specific data in a
single structure
Hi Christoffer,
On 09/03/2016 12:47, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 11:29:27AM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
>> For now, there is only one member. More member will be added later.
>
> questionable commit message
What about:
"The ACPI code requires to use global variables in order to collect
information from the tables.
For now only a single global variable is used, but more will be added in
a subsequent patch. To make clear they are ACPI specific, gather all the
information in a single structure."
[...]
>> @@ -1316,7 +1319,7 @@ static int __init gic_v2_acpi_init(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - cpu_base = ioremap(cpu_phy_base, ACPI_GIC_CPU_IF_MEM_SIZE);
>> + cpu_base = ioremap(acpi_data.cpu_phy_base, ACPI_GIC_CPU_IF_MEM_SIZE);
>> if (!cpu_base) {
>> pr_err("Unable to map GICC registers\n");
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
> super nit: I would use cpu_phys_base instead of cpu_phy_base, but I'll
> leave it up to you.
I will update the commit message, so I will rename the variable too.
>
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
Powered by blists - more mailing lists