[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DFDD72.5020807@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:23:14 -0800
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...driver.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v4.4-rt PATCH] rt: trace: add rcuidle version macro for
preemptirqsoff_hist and hrtimer_interrupt
On 3/8/2016 12:10 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 12:45 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/hist.h b/include/trace/events/hist.h
>> index 6122e42..37f6eb8 100644
>> --- a/include/trace/events/hist.h
>> +++ b/include/trace/events/hist.h
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>
>> #if !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_OFF_HIST) && !defined(CONFIG_INTERRUPT_OFF_HIST)
>> #define trace_preemptirqsoff_hist(a, b)
>> +#define trace_preemptirqsoff_hist_rcuidle(a, b)
>> #else
>> TRACE_EVENT(preemptirqsoff_hist,
> I have this piece already in my tree.
>
>>
>> @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(preemptirqsoff_hist,
>>
>> #ifndef CONFIG_MISSED_TIMER_OFFSETS_HIST
>> #define trace_hrtimer_interrupt(a, b, c, d)
>> +#define trace_hrtimer_interrupt_rcuidle(a, b, c, d)
>> #else
>> TRACE_EVENT(hrtimer_interrupt,
> I was thinking about this but then I saw no users of it. Do we have
> any? (haven't seen them in v4.1 either).
AFAIK, no users. It got brought in by the forward port of 4.1 patch. We
could remove it.
Thanks,
Yang
>
> Sebastian
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists