[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160309095824.GC10517@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:58:24 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Subject: arm: at91: do not disable/enable clocks in a row
* Alexandre Belloni | 2016-03-08 19:39:10 [+0100]:
>Hi,
Hi,
>Both are things to work on. In the mean time, I'm using the following
>patch:
>https://github.com/alexandrebelloni/linux/commit/3a2eae463fce18ae815b887a5c9ca1a657b180ac
>
>I understood from
>http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1601.2/00941.html that this
>was not your preferred course of action.
That was one thing. What about this:
---
Currently the driver will disable the clock and enable it one line later
if it is switching from periodic mode into one shot.
This can be avoided and causes a needless warning on -RT.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/tcb_clksrc.c
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static struct clocksource clksrc = {
struct tc_clkevt_device {
struct clock_event_device clkevt;
struct clk *clk;
+ bool clk_enabled;
void __iomem *regs;
};
@@ -91,6 +92,24 @@ static struct tc_clkevt_device *to_tc_cl
*/
static u32 timer_clock;
+static void tc_clk_disable(struct clock_event_device *d)
+{
+ struct tc_clkevt_device *tcd = to_tc_clkevt(d);
+
+ clk_disable(tcd->clk);
+ tcd->clk_enabled = false;
+}
+
+static void tc_clk_enable(struct clock_event_device *d)
+{
+ struct tc_clkevt_device *tcd = to_tc_clkevt(d);
+
+ if (tcd->clk_enabled)
+ return;
+ clk_enable(tcd->clk);
+ tcd->clk_enabled = true;
+}
+
static int tc_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *d)
{
struct tc_clkevt_device *tcd = to_tc_clkevt(d);
@@ -98,8 +117,14 @@ static int tc_shutdown(struct clock_even
__raw_writel(0xff, regs + ATMEL_TC_REG(2, IDR));
__raw_writel(ATMEL_TC_CLKDIS, regs + ATMEL_TC_REG(2, CCR));
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int tc_shutdown_clk_off(struct clock_event_device *d)
+{
+ tc_shutdown(d);
if (!clockevent_state_detached(d))
- clk_disable(tcd->clk);
+ tc_clk_disable(d);
return 0;
}
@@ -112,7 +137,7 @@ static int tc_set_oneshot(struct clock_e
if (clockevent_state_oneshot(d) || clockevent_state_periodic(d))
tc_shutdown(d);
- clk_enable(tcd->clk);
+ tc_clk_enable(d);
/* slow clock, count up to RC, then irq and stop */
__raw_writel(timer_clock | ATMEL_TC_CPCSTOP | ATMEL_TC_WAVE |
@@ -134,7 +159,7 @@ static int tc_set_periodic(struct clock_
/* By not making the gentime core emulate periodic mode on top
* of oneshot, we get lower overhead and improved accuracy.
*/
- clk_enable(tcd->clk);
+ tc_clk_enable(d);
/* slow clock, count up to RC, then irq and restart */
__raw_writel(timer_clock | ATMEL_TC_WAVE | ATMEL_TC_WAVESEL_UP_AUTO,
@@ -168,7 +193,7 @@ static struct tc_clkevt_device clkevt =
/* Should be lower than at91rm9200's system timer */
.rating = 125,
.set_next_event = tc_next_event,
- .set_state_shutdown = tc_shutdown,
+ .set_state_shutdown = tc_shutdown_clk_off,
.set_state_periodic = tc_set_periodic,
.set_state_oneshot = tc_set_oneshot,
},
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists