[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160309130839.GA7978@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:08:40 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] CONFIG_FORCE_MINIMALLY_SANE_CONFIG=y (was: Re: [RFC PATCH]
x86/kconfig: Sanity-check config file during oldconfig)
* Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 09:20:22AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > + select SYSFS_DEPRECATED
> ...
>
> > And yes, many of these options are members of the 'SystemD debuggability Hall Of
> > Shame'... It cost me many, many days of painful config-bisection to figure the
> > often obscure dependencies out, so we might as well upstream this information.
>
> And you've got it wrong ;)
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/README#n54
>
> udev will fail to work with the legacy sysfs layout:
> CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=n
That's with new systemd. The Fedora 19 system I tested it on certainly failed in
the way I documented it.
So we now have a kernel option that breaks older SystemD if unset, and breaks
newer SystemD if set.
Bravo!
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists