lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gh41=19yHaZFRyxNd7uiVcU8sxhMpiZS64y+RYGYzBnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:12:19 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
	Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: postfix policy directory with the first
 CPU in related_cpus"

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 03-03-16, 14:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> This reverts commit 3510fac45492 ("cpufreq: postfix policy directory
>> with the first CPU in related_cpus").
>>
>> Earlier, the policy->kobj was added to the kobject core, before ->init()
>> callback was called for the cpufreq drivers. Which allowed those drivers
>> to add or remove, driver dependent, sysfs files/directories to the same
>> kobj from their ->init() and ->exit() callbacks.
>>
>> That isn't possible anymore after commit 3510fac45492 got applied.
>>
>> Now, there is no other clean alternative that people can adopt.
>>
>> Its better to revert the earlier commit to allow cpufreq drivers to
>> create/remove sysfs files from ->init() and ->exit() callbacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>
> Sorry about missing SoB (Just noticed it in bleeding-edge).

For a revert that's not a problem, but I'll add it.

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ