linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: Fix MACRO for commonly declared MFD cell attributes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56E023B2.5020207@nvidia.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Mar 2016 18:52:58 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Fix MACRO for commonly declared MFD cell attributes

Hi Lee,

On Wednesday 02 March 2016 06:38 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
>> On Friday 26 February 2016 10:05 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>>> Did you not see warnings like this when you compiled the kernel? Did you
>>> find a different approach than what I proposed above to deal with it?
>>> I'd like to get this in soon so that when the max77620 drivers are all
>>> in and using it, it should be functional.
>>>
>> I think the following change also crash in runtime:
>>
>> /***
>> commit e60a946f05db2cac857025da6ffb72df48d3be54
>> Author: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>>
>>      mfd: ab8500: Provide a small example using new MFD cell MACROs
>>
>> ***/
>>
>> Should we have something MFD_CELL_RES, MFD_CELL_RES_PDATA,
>> MFD_CELL_PDATA, for more common user and not to pass the NULL here.
> I'll have a re-think about this.

Did you get chance to look into this? Probably, I need to send my mfd 
series once this get fixed before that series applied.