[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E0583A.1080205@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:07:06 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 9 (net: bpf)
On 03/09/16 08:48, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 05:44 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 03/08/16 21:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20160308:
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> ../net/core/filter.c: In function 'bpf_skb_get_tunnel_opt':
>> ../net/core/filter.c:1824:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ip_tunnel_info_opts_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> ip_tunnel_info_opts_get(to, info);
>> ^
>> ../net/core/filter.c: In function 'bpf_skb_set_tunnel_opt':
>> ../net/core/filter.c:1918:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ip_tunnel_info_opts_set' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> ip_tunnel_info_opts_set(info, from, size);
>> ^
>> Full randconfig file is attached.
>
> Already fixed with net-next commit e28e87ed474c ("ip_tunnel, bpf:
> ip_tunnel_info_opts_{get, set} depends on CONFIG_INET").
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
Hi Daniel,
Is that patch on the netdev mailing list or patchwork?
I can't find it.
Does it handle where net/Kconfig symbol NET selects BPF unconditionally?
thanks,
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists