linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Revert earlier patch of Disable AVX when eagerfpu is off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160309184224.GC17956@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Mar 2016 19:42:24 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>,
	"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
	Leonid Shatz <leonid.shatz@...ellosystems.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Revert earlier patch of Disable AVX when
 eagerfpu is off


* Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:46:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > AVX was mistakenly believed to be dependent on eagerfpu switch.
> > > This turns out to be false. The earlier patch should be reverted.
> > > 
> > > Original patch:
> > >     http://git.kernel.org/tip/394db20ca240741a08d472173db13d6f6a6e5a28
> > 
> > So the original patch had a whole host of explanations of why that change is 
> > correct. This revert should explain where that argumentation was wrong.
> 
> I will send out another version that includes more details.

Great, thanks!

	Ingo