lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:45:04 -0500
From:	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
	cov@...eaurora.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	ravikanth.nalla@....com, lenb@...nel.org, harish.k@....com,
	ashwin.reghunandanan@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment

Hi Bjorn,

On 3/8/2016 2:04 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>> The point here is that a PCI Interrupt Link can only use an IRQ that
>>> >> is level-triggered, active low.  If an IRQ is already set to any other
>>> >> state, whether for an ISA device or for an active-high SCI, we can't
>>> >> use it for a PCI Interrupt Link.
> Unfortunately, this still doesn't hold. 
> 
> A patch is long overdue for this series. I'll post v3. We can go from there.

I just posted a new series and changed the title. Let's continue the discussion there.

[PATCH 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements
...

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists