linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/5] ftrace: Make ftrace_hash_rec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1457556405-27717-5-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed,  9 Mar 2016 21:46:44 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] ftrace: Make ftrace_hash_rec_enable return update bool

Change __ftrace_hash_rec_update to return true in case
we need to update dynamic ftrace call records. It return
false in case no update is needed.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index eca592f977b2..123dddc660e9 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@ static bool test_rec_ops_needs_regs(struct dyn_ftrace *rec)
 	return  keep_regs;
 }
 
-static void __ftrace_hash_rec_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
+static bool __ftrace_hash_rec_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 				     int filter_hash,
 				     bool inc)
 {
@@ -1618,12 +1618,13 @@ static void __ftrace_hash_rec_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 	struct ftrace_hash *other_hash;
 	struct ftrace_page *pg;
 	struct dyn_ftrace *rec;
+	bool update = false;
 	int count = 0;
 	int all = 0;
 
 	/* Only update if the ops has been registered */
 	if (!(ops->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_ENABLED))
-		return;
+		return false;
 
 	/*
 	 * In the filter_hash case:
@@ -1650,7 +1651,7 @@ static void __ftrace_hash_rec_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 		 * then there's nothing to do.
 		 */
 		if (ftrace_hash_empty(hash))
-			return;
+			return false;
 	}
 
 	do_for_each_ftrace_rec(pg, rec) {
@@ -1694,7 +1695,7 @@ static void __ftrace_hash_rec_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 		if (inc) {
 			rec->flags++;
 			if (FTRACE_WARN_ON(ftrace_rec_count(rec) == FTRACE_REF_MAX))
-				return;
+				return false;
 
 			/*
 			 * If there's only a single callback registered to a
@@ -1720,7 +1721,7 @@ static void __ftrace_hash_rec_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 				rec->flags |= FTRACE_FL_REGS;
 		} else {
 			if (FTRACE_WARN_ON(ftrace_rec_count(rec) == 0))
-				return;
+				return false;
 			rec->flags--;
 
 			/*
@@ -1753,22 +1754,27 @@ static void __ftrace_hash_rec_update(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 			 */
 		}
 		count++;
+
+		update |= ftrace_test_record(rec, 1) != FTRACE_UPDATE_IGNORE;
+
 		/* Shortcut, if we handled all records, we are done. */
 		if (!all && count == hash->count)
-			return;
+			return update;
 	} while_for_each_ftrace_rec();
+
+	return update;
 }
 
-static void ftrace_hash_rec_disable(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
+static bool ftrace_hash_rec_disable(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 				    int filter_hash)
 {
-	__ftrace_hash_rec_update(ops, filter_hash, 0);
+	return __ftrace_hash_rec_update(ops, filter_hash, 0);
 }
 
-static void ftrace_hash_rec_enable(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
+static bool ftrace_hash_rec_enable(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 				   int filter_hash)
 {
-	__ftrace_hash_rec_update(ops, filter_hash, 1);
+	return __ftrace_hash_rec_update(ops, filter_hash, 1);
 }
 
 static void ftrace_hash_rec_update_modify(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
-- 
2.4.3