[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E10227.2010608@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:42:07 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
CC: hughd@...gle.com, kirill@...temov.name, n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/9] powerpc/hugetlb: Enable ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB for
BOOK3S 64K
On 03/10/2016 01:28 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> > [ text/plain ]
>> > This enables ARCH_WANT_GENERAL_HUGETLB for BOOK3S 64K in Kconfig.
>> > It also implements a new function 'pte_huge' which is required by
>> > function 'huge_pte_alloc' from generic VM. Existing BOOK3S 64K
>> > specific functions 'huge_pte_alloc' and 'huge_pte_offset' (which
>> > are no longer required) are removed with this change.
>> >
> You want this to be the last patch isn't it ? And you are mixing too
Yeah, it should be the last one.
> many things in this patch. Why not do this
>
> * book3s specific hash pte routines
> * book3s add conditional based on GENERAL_HUGETLB
> * Enable GENERAL_HUGETLB for 64k page size config
which creates three separate patches ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists