[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160310003637.GA21119@sejong>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:36:37 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ftrace perf: Check sample types only for sampling
events
Hi Jiri,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:46:41PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Currently we check sample type for ftrace:function event
> even if it's not created as sampling event. That prevents
> creating ftrace_function event in counting mode.
>
> Making sure we check sample types only for sampling events.
>
> Before:
> $ sudo perf stat -e ftrace:function ls
> ...
>
> Performance counter stats for 'ls':
>
> <not supported> ftrace:function
>
> 0.001983662 seconds time elapsed
>
> After:
> $ sudo perf stat -e ftrace:function ls
> ...
>
> Performance counter stats for 'ls':
>
> 44,498 ftrace:function
>
> 0.037534722 seconds time elapsed
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> index 00df25fd86ef..a7171ec2c1ca 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
> @@ -52,14 +52,14 @@ static int perf_trace_event_perm(struct trace_event_call *tp_event,
> * event, due to issues with page faults while tracing page
> * fault handler and its overall trickiness nature.
> */
> - if (!p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user)
> + if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && !p_event->attr.exclude_callchain_user)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> * Same reason to disable user stack dump as for user space
> * callchains above.
> */
> - if (p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER)
> + if (is_sampling_event(p_event) && p_event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
What about checking is_sampling_event() first and goto the last
paranoid_tracepoint_raw check instead? This way we can remove the
same check in the function trace case.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists