lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160310091840.GC5026@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:18:40 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree

On Thu 10-03-16 10:40:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/ext4/inode.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   109811c20fb8 ("ext4: simplify io_end handling for AIO DIO")
> 
> from the ext4 tree and commit:
> 
>   74c66bcb7eda ("ext4: Fix data exposure after failed AIO DIO")
> 
> from the xfs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

Thanks. The merge looks correct.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ