[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E15032.5060302@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:15:06 +0530
From: Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: mpe@...erman.id.au
CC: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/powernv: Cpuidle related cleanup
Hi,
Any thoughts on this?
On 02/29/2016 05:52 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> These patches are purely code movement and cleanup.
> There is no functionality change.
>
> Note, there are multiple style error reported for patch 1 and 2.
> I think this is because checkpatch script mistakes the patches
> as C code because of the presence of semi-colon in each line. I
> for now have largely ignored these errors.
>
> Shreyas B. Prabhu (3):
> powerpc/powernv: Move CHECK_HMI_INTERRUPT to exception-64s header
> powerpc/powernv: Encapsulate idle preparation steps in a macro
> powerpc/powernv: make hypervisor state restore a function
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 68 ++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h | 19 ++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 29 +-----
> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power7.S | 148 ++++++++-----------------------
> 4 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists