linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ppc64le live patch: get rid of mini stack frame

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2016 13:51:16 +0100
From:	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:	Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
Cc:	jeyu@...hat.com, jkosina@...e.cz, jikos@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, mbenes@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ppc64le live patch: get rid of mini stack frame

On Thu 2016-03-10 13:25:08, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-03-09 18:30:17, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > After the mini stack frame is no longer required for TOC storage, it can
> > be eliminated iff the functionality of klp_return_helper, which required
> > a stack frame for the extra return address previously, is carried out
> > by the replacement function now. This requires _every_ live patch replacement
> > function to execute the following (or similar) sequence of machine instructions
> > just before every return to the original caller:
> 
> I have thought about it and it is a nono from my point of view.
> It is too error prone, especially that there are functions that
> call return on several locations.

BTW: How is this solved in kretprobes? Or is it easier there?

Best Regards,
Petr