[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E1743C.90805@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:18:52 -0600
From: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, <nsekhar@...com>,
<dwmw2@...radead.org>, <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
<tony@...mide.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] memory: omap-gpmc: Store handle to GPMC dev
On 03/10/2016 06:40 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Franklin,
>
> On 10/03/16 06:07, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>> The dma channel information is located within the GPMC node. The NAND
>> driver requires a handle to the GPMC's dev to properly parse the DMA
>> properties. Therefore, store a handle to the dev so it can be referenced
>> within the NAND driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 1 +
>> include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>> index 6515dfc..2932d13 100644
>> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
>> @@ -1796,6 +1796,7 @@ static int gpmc_probe_nand_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>
>> gpmc_nand_data->cs = val;
>> gpmc_nand_data->of_node = child;
>> + gpmc_nand_data->gpmc_dev = &pdev->dev;
>>
>> /* Detect availability of ELM module */
>> gpmc_nand_data->elm_of_node = of_parse_phandle(child, "ti,elm-id", 0);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
>> index 090bbab..534b984 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-omap2.h
>> @@ -80,5 +80,7 @@ struct omap_nand_platform_data {
>> /* for passing the partitions */
>> struct device_node *of_node;
>> struct device_node *elm_of_node;
>> +
>> + struct device *gpmc_dev;
>> };
>> #endif
>>
> Why do you need this? Can't we just use dev->parent in the omap2-nand driver?
Dev->parent doesn't point to omap-gpmc's dev. Its because
platform_device_alloc is used to create the platform_device
so a proper parent isn't defined. It should be possible to
force omap2-nand dev's parent property to the GPMC's dev but
that didn't seem right when I thought about doing it.
>
> cheers,
> -roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists