[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56E19224.9090906@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:26:28 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: gleb@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Remove redundant smp_mb() in the
kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page()
On 10/03/2016 15:40, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> long dirty_count = kvm->tlbs_dirty;
>
> + /*
> + * read tlbs_dirty before doing tlb flush to make sure not tlb
> request is
> + * lost.
> + */
> smp_mb();
> +
> if (kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH))
> ++kvm->stat.remote_tlb_flush;
> cmpxchg(&kvm->tlbs_dirty, dirty_count, 0);
>
>
> Any comment?
Compared to smp_load_acquire(), smp_mb() adds an ordering between stores
and loads. Is the
The load of kvm->tlbs_dirty should then be
/*
* Read tlbs_dirty before setting KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH in
* kvm_make_all_cpus_request. This
*/
long dirty_count = smp_load_acquire(kvm->tlbs_dirty);
Tianyu, I think Xiao provided the information that I was missing. Would
you like to prepare the patch?
Thanks,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists