linux-kernel - Re: checkpatch.pl false positive: FSF mailing address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAN8TOE-dOUsuPfm8cp6c3k94XRzyyCb1g7sAaPeOdaxS9zG-uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:15:23 -0800
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: checkpatch.pl false positive: FSF mailing address

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 11:00 -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>> Hi Joe,
>
> Hi Brian.
>
>> I found this false positive amusing:
>>
>> $ curl http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/577786/mbox/ | scripts/checkpatch.pl -
>> [...]
>> ERROR: Do not include the paragraph about writing to the Free Software
>> Foundation's mailing address from the sample GPL notice. The FSF has
>> changed addresses in the past, and may do so again. Linux already
>> includes a copy of the GPL.
>> #1489: FILE: drivers/mtd/nand/qcom_nandc.c:1335:
>> +^I^I * write to the free oob area.$
>> [...]
>>
>> The patch is:
>>   http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/577786/
>>   [PATCH v8,2/3] mtd: nand: Qualcomm NAND controller driver
>>
>> and the comment text is:
>>
>>   "For the last codeword, we skip the bbm positions and write to the
>>   free oob area."
>>
>> which matches on this:
>>
>> # Check for FSF mailing addresses.
>>                 if ($rawline =~ /\bwrite to the Free/i ||
>>
>> I'm just writing as recommended by the closing text of your tool.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Yeah, it's amusing.  It's also likely not something worth
> bothering with though as the likelihood of fixing it is low
> and eventually the FSF warning will be minimized or removed
> as no longer necessary.

An easy improvement: don't use "ignore case" for the regex.

> checkpatch is stupid, false positives will always exist.

Regards,
Brian