[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160310191933.GC2194@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:19:33 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...driver.com>,
"Hart, Darren" <darren.hart@...el.com>,
"saul.wold" <saul.wold@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: runtime regression with "x86/mm/pat: Emulate PAT when it is
disabled"
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 02:04:29PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> So, I guess that is a qemu bug? If there is no real silicon out there
> that has no MTRR but does claim PAT, then qemu32 is a flawed CPU type?
Well, AFAICT, "qemu32" is emulating something PPRO-like:
#define PPRO_FEATURES (CPUID_FP87 | CPUID_DE | CPUID_PSE | CPUID_TSC | \
CPUID_MSR | CPUID_MCE | CPUID_CX8 | CPUID_PGE | CPUID_CMOV | \
CPUID_PAT | CPUID_FXSR | CPUID_MMX | CPUID_SSE | CPUID_SSE2 | \
^^^^^^^^^
and that one advertizes PAT but not MTRRs.
I need to go dig into history to find out what PPRO actually supported.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists