[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1457672269-29584-1-git-send-email-rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:27:49 +0530
From: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@....com>
To: <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <mathias.nyman@...el.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] xhci: fix typo in babble endpoint handling comment
The 0.95 xHCI spec says that non-control endpoints will be halted if a
babble is detected on a transfer. The 0.96 xHCI spec says all types of
endpoints will be halted when a babble is detected. Some hardware that
claims to be 0.95 compliant halts the control endpoint anyway.
Reference: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg21755.html
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@....com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
index 3915657..59841a9 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
@@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ static int xhci_requires_manual_halt_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
if (trb_comp_code == COMP_TX_ERR ||
trb_comp_code == COMP_BABBLE ||
trb_comp_code == COMP_SPLIT_ERR)
- /* The 0.96 spec says a babbling control endpoint
+ /* The 0.95 spec says a babbling control endpoint
* is not halted. The 0.96 spec says it is. Some HW
* claims to be 0.95 compliant, but it halts the control
* endpoint anyway. Check if a babble halted the
--
2.6.2.198.g614a2ac
Powered by blists - more mailing lists