[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gO4EZnBuVKXT8+gsMhbHJzuK7sfr0uRcjVdJP-nUUz4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 22:47:10 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, robin.murphy@....com,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
geert+renesas@...der.be, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Dan J Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] dma-mapping: add dma_{map,unmap}_resource
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Niklas S??derlund
<niklas.soderlund@...natech.se> wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> On 2016-03-07 23:38:47 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Please add some documentation on where/how this should be used. It's
>> not a very obvious interface.
>
> Good idea, I have added the following to Documentation/DMA-API.txt and
> folded it in to this patch. Do you feel it's adequate and do you know
> anywhere else I should add documentation?
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-API.txt b/Documentation/DMA-API.txt
> index 45ef3f2..248556a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/DMA-API.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/DMA-API.txt
> @@ -277,14 +277,29 @@ and <size> parameters are provided to do partial page mapping, it is
> recommended that you never use these unless you really know what the
> cache width is.
>
> +dma_addr_t
> +dma_map_resource(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> + enum dma_data_direction dir, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +
> +Maps a MMIO region so it can be accessed by the device and returns the
> +DMA address of the memory. API should only be used to map device MMIO,
> +mapping of RAM is not permitted.
> +
I think it is confusing to use the dma_ prefix for this peer-to-peer
mmio functionality. dma_addr_t is a device's view of host memory.
Something like bus_addr_t bus_map_resource(). Doesn't this routine
also need the source device in addition to the target device? The
resource address is from the perspective of the host cpu, it may be a
different address space in the view of two devices relative to each
other.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists