linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/18] mm: make vm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:12:35 +0100
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
	Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Petr Cermak <petrcermak@...omium.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] mm: make vm_mmap killable

On Fri 11-03-16 10:59:30, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 02:26 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> >
> >All the callers of vm_mmap seem to check for the failure already
> >and bail out in one way or another on the error which means that
> 
> Hmm I'm not that sure about this one:
>   17   1071  fs/binfmt_elf.c <<load_elf_binary>>
> 
> Assigns result of vm_mmap() to "error" variable which is never checked.

Yes it is not checked but not used either. If the current got killed
then it wouldn't return to the userspace so my understanding is that not
checking this value is not a problem. At least that is my understanding.

> Shouldn't __must_check trigger here?

well, __must_check is a misleading name. It doesn't actually enforce the
value is checked. It just has to be used and an assignment is
sufficient. I was discussing this without our gcc guy and he promissed
to look and try to come up with a different attribute which would
actually work like __must_check.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs