[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160311140947.GD14808@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 06:09:47 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 09/22] richacl: Permission check algorithm
> fs/Makefile | 2 +-
> fs/richacl_inode.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What's the point of a tiny separate file here? All richacls files
together are still small, and it would be much preferably to have all
that code together.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists