[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda8r-=vjXH8TnR19vjY3cwKKH0tb8UWdkfpHpwV9U0_aw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 21:53:50 +0700
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>,
Arianna Avanzini <avanzini.arianna@...il.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 09/22] block, cfq: replace CFQ with the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> We use blkj-mq for single queue devices as well, in fact most consumers
> are single queue. MMC is a prime candidate that hould move over soon.
OK we should do that with some before-and-after tests and see what
happens.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists