[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVc-GaqWC+MZm08YOUCMumzQ-TJK4h296LMtpQPdPS=0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:14:20 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, digitaleric@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: don't allow irq_fpu_usable when the VCPU's XCR0
is loaded
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:47 PM, David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Northup <digitaleric@...gle.com>
>
> Add a percpu boolean, tracking whether a KVM vCPU is running on the
> host CPU. KVM will set and clear it as it loads/unloads guest XCR0.
> (Note that the rest of the guest FPU load/restore is safe, because
> kvm_load_guest_fpu and kvm_put_guest_fpu call __kernel_fpu_begin()
> and __kernel_fpu_end(), respectively.) irq_fpu_usable() will then
> also check for this percpu boolean.
Is this better than just always keeping the host's XCR0 loaded outside
if the KVM interrupts-disabled region?
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists